I need more iron

and it seems I’m not the only one.

During my search for answers on why I‘m not getting enough and what the difference is between supplements, I was frustrated at the lack of clear answers. Hopefully my research will help others struggling to work out the same thing. I’m a designer not a doctor, but that might make me the perfect person to explain things simply.

A good start starting point is considering how we absorb it.

Iron overload however can be worse.

Increased risk of infection

Both iron deficiency and overload can make you tired (as well as lots of other things) so self diagnosis is definitely not recommended. The test is a simple blood test. The lab will indicate the healthy range, but here’s what the different measurements mean.

Only a fraction of the ferritin in your body is in the blood, but measuring this ferritin gives a good indication of your overall iron storage. Ferritin is the first iron to deplete so it‘s the early warning sign of iron deficiency.

The amount of iron attached to transferrin is an indicator of how much iron is in your body. As well as measuring the serum iron, usually another test is done to check that transferrin is working properly (TIBC or direct transferrin test). Using these two tests you’re given Transferrin Saturation(TS)%.

This measures the amount of hemoglobin in the blood which is needed to transport oxygen around the body. Low Hb is the final stage of iron deficiency and is an indicator for anemia. Low iron isn’t the only thing that causes anemia, which is why all the tests are needed for the full picture.

There are two factors that make up how much iron you’re getting:

It’s not so hard finding the iron content of things but determining bioavailability is a challenge.

Inhibitors form a compound with iron that stops it getting absorbed. Phytate is the main inhibitor of plant food which is found mostly in legumes and cereal grains. A bit annoying seeing as legumes are especially high in iron. Preparations like soaking, sprouting and fermenting can greatly reduce the phytate content and therefore increase their bioavailability.

Polyphenols (used to be called vegetable tannins) are another category of inhibitors. They’re found in lots of tasty things like teas, coffee, red wine and cocoa. There are different types of polyphenols with different inhibitory strength, for example tea polyphenols inhibit more than coffee or wine ones.

Certain proteins like whey and casein found in milk, and egg proteins inhibit non-heme iron. The protein in soy beans has also been found to inhibit iron.

The last inhibitor usually cited is calcium, which unlike the others affects both heme and non-heme iron. There is debate around how much calcium affects iron directly, and how much it affects it by blocking phytates from releasing or due to the proteins it’s often taken with. So at this stage it’s a maybe.

Looking for ways to get all your iron needs from food is ideal, but if it’s not happening for you or you need a quick boost then supplements are a proven option. Comparing the bioavailability of supplements is a lot more difficult than I anticipated. In addition to all the problems with measuring bioavailability listed above, supplements don’t require any clinical trials to test their effectiveness. There is so little relevant data especially on the newer iron types.

Rather than skip this important comparison, I’ve put the data I found into a best approximation. So treat this as such and check out my source documents if you’d like to see what clinical trials were used. Throughout I’m always comparing the elemental weight of iron in each supplment. This is the weight of Fe, not the weight of the whole compound.

Ferrous sulfate (also spelt sulphate) is the most common iron supplement, and for good reason. It’s very soluble so it’s fast working, it has good bioavailability and is the cheapest form. When overall bioavailability has been measured for ferrous sulphate it seems around the 20% mark, but going up towards 40% for anemic people and with enhancers, and towards zero for people with sufficient iron and inhibitors present. Most studies use relative bioavailability (RBV) as a measurement in order to cancel out some of the fluctuations, in which case sulfate is the reference and is set at 100%.

Ferrous gluconate is a soluble iron salt that seems to be less bioavailable than ferrous sulfate but not by much — like around 90% of sulfate levels. When comparing the same dose, there weren’t any reported differences in side effects between gluconate and sulfate. Supplement doses tend to be smaller in gluconate though, which could be why it is viewed as gentler on the stomach. Especially in formulations like Floradix which people talk about being gentle on the stomach, the amount of gluconate is only 10mg per serving. Like the other iron salts, gluconate is prone to the effects of enhancers and inhibitors so care needs to be taken with what it’s consumed with.

Ferrous fumarate is the least soluble out of these ferrous salts. This means it’s a little more reliant on gastric acid to dissolve and takes a little longer to absorb. Ferrous fumarate is often referred to as having less bioavailability than sulfate and gentler on the stomach. This makes sense due to its lower solubility, but I haven’t found the studies to back that up. Most rate its bioavailability and side effects the same as sulfate. Inhibitors and enhancers affect it, but one thing to note is that unlike sulfate, it isn’t enhanced by Na2EDTA. Na2EDTA is often added to processed foods to stop oxidation, so that’s one source of enhancers that fumarate misses out on.

FeBC is a type of iron amino acid chelate with a structure of one molecule of iron bound by two molecules of glycine. There are other types of iron amino acid chelates but FeBC is the main one, often going by the brand name of Ferrochel®. It’s a very soluble and stable form of iron, so compared to sulfate it’s less likely to cause irritation during digestion. It is still affected by inhibitors, but this is estimated at about half as much as sulfate. Most studies conclude its bioavailability is the same as sulfate either at the same dose or at half the dose. Not sure why the lower does the same job, but it implies that it could have a higher bioavailability. It needs more studies to confirm this.

Ferritin is what we and nearly all organisms use to store iron. It’s a protein with an “iron core” of up to 4500 ferric iron molecules inside. Although ferritin can come from both plant and animal sources, bovine ferritin is what is used most in studies. The number of ferric molecules inside ferritin can vary, and animal sources tend to have higher concentrations compared to plant sources. It was originally thought that all the ferritin we consume is absorbed in the normal non-heme way, where the protein opens up during digestion and the ferric iron is released. Many studies have now shown that as well as this method of absorption it also has its own pathway where it can get absorbed into intestinal cells whole. Which of these two pathways ferritin takes seems to depend on the conditions of the stomach such as gastric acids and stomach pH. If the ferritin stays whole through digestion then inhibitors don’t affect it. Unlike all other non-heme iron, ascorbic acid seems to have a negative effect on it unless it is enteric coated.

There is a bit of a divide with studies measuring the bioavailability of ferritin. Older studies that use extrinsic labeling put the bioavailability quite low. Newer studies use intrinsic labeling which claim to be more accurate, and show that ferritin has the same bioavailability as ferrous sulfate. So ferritin seems like it could be a pretty good source of iron, but there are few commercial supplements of it. Infact I could only find one expensive product that has little information about it. How this supplement compares to ferritin in existing studies is unknown. In terms of side effects, there are few studies on it but it is generally considered to have low side effects which makes sense due to its stable structure and naturally slow release.

IPS (sometimes called ITF282) is a form of ferric iron bound to milk protein. This protein casing protects it from being solubilised in the stomach, and instead it opens up in the intestines. This translates into good tolerability, and studies tend to put it at around half the side effects of sulfate. In terms of its bioavailability, it’s generally put at a little less than ferrous sulfate. Interestingly, a couple of studies show it overtaking sulfate in effectiveness after prolonged use. It is speculated that this could be because it causes less irritation, which is known to inhibit future absorption. There’s not much information about how it’s affected by inhibitors and enhancers, but it would make sense that it would be affected less while in the stomach, and when the ferric iron has been released it would be acted on in the usual way.

There are different types of PIC, but generally this complex is made from a carbohydrate and ferric iron. Like the other larger synthetic complexes, the idea is that the carbohydrate stabilizes the iron while it’s in the stomach so it is less likely to react and cause irritation. Once in the small intestines it releases the ferric iron so it can be converted to ferrous iron and absorbed. That’s the idea, but it’s hard to say how well it does this due to a lack of good studies on it. It appears that its bioavailability is a bit less than ferrous sulfate and that it has less negative side effects. There’s not much information on the enhancers and inhibitors, but it seems like they affect it a bit less than sulfate.

Carbonyl is a highly purified form of iron. The difference between it and other elemental iron powders isn’t the iron but rather the manufacturing process and in particular the size of iron particles. Carbonyl is the most bioavailable of all the iron powders, but when compared against ferrous sulfate it is generally considered around 75% as bioavailable. Carbonyl needs stomach gastric acids to solubilize it before it can be absorbed which makes it quite susceptible to the negative effects of food. Wheat especially seems to decimate its absorption. This requirement of gastric acids means that it is naturally slowly released, which makes it very safe and also translates into low gastro side effects.

In studies for children it seems to do a bit better than adults, which is probably due to the smaller dose and/or differences in gastric acids. As well as the safety aspect, another feature that could make it appealing as a choice for children is the small pill size and its availability in a chewable form.

HIP is classified as a medical food rather than a supplement, but I think it’s worth lumping it with the rest for comparison. The heme iron in HIP generally comes from bovine hemoglobin, although it is possible to get heme iron from plant sources like soy. Unlike all the other supplements, it gets absorbed through the heme pathway which means that it stays whole through digestion and isn’t affected by most of the enhancers and inhibitors. Its only enhancer is meat tissue, and it is possibly inhibited by calcium. Because HIP isn’t that affected by inhibitors, it’s easy to get wildly different results when comparing it against other supplements depending on what food it’s taken with. From looking at the small selection of studies on it, I’d put it about twice as bioavailable as ferrous sulfate but that’s just a best guess. So HIP seems to be an effective supplement with the flexibility of being able to be taken with food and with low levels of side effects. The negatives are that it’s expensive and there is a lack of studies on the commercial HIP products. They may perform differently to the HIP in the studies.

I really wanted to add intravenous iron to the chart but it wouldn’t quite squish into the same comparison categories. IV isn’t a type of iron but rather the method of injecting iron directly into the blood stream. This has the bonus of bypassing the whole gastric system, so in terms of gastric side effects it’s about zero. Bioavailability is really high because it’s absorbed straight into the bloodstream and therefore it also can’t react with any food.

Sounds pretty awesome except like everything there are some big downsides. One, as mentioned previously is the risk of having too much iron floating around in your body. This risk doesn’t seem too high if you’re low on iron and without a high risk of infection, but we don’t fully know what effects there could be from big spikes in our bodies iron levels. As a precaution it is not recommended during the first trimester of pregnancy.

The other big downside is the price to adminster and the cost of the iron formulae. The price of administering IV iron is coming down due to advances in IV iron formulas. Older types were suitable only for multiple small dose injections or else large dose infusions that needed a lengthy hospital visit. Newer formulas can be given by one quick high dose injection from your GP. The other side of price is the cost of the iron formula, which is surprisingly high. The newer formulas that are easier to administer seem to be priced in the $US 80–300 mark for 1,000mg of iron. It doesn’t seem like an efficient way of tackling iron deficiency except for urgent cases or patients that aren’t responding to other methods. That could change though if prices come down.

Lactoferrin is an interesting protein and worth a mention because it has been shown to increase iron levels. It’s primarily found in human milk but there is also a similar version of it in cows’ milk. It can bind strongly to two molecules of ferric iron and has a direct pathway into our intestinal cells in a similar way that heme and ferritin does. It also has extremely low side effects, so you’d think it would be a good iron supplement but there is more to it. Seeing as it strongly attracts iron, if we take it in its depleted form then rather than give us iron it can scavenge iron from our bodies. This can be a good thing because it can take free iron away from bacteria. In fact this is one of the great things about lactoferrin, it has been shown to have lots of anti-microbial and anti-inflammatory properties.

The debate around lactoferrin is whether the increase in iron levels that we see (about the same increase as ferrous sulfate) is due to lactoferrin giving iron or its ability to reduce inflammation. It seems like it’s more to do with its anti-bacterial properties and generally it’s recommended not to be taken by itself for iron deficiency but possibly with other iron. Most lactoferrin supplements are in the depleted iron form, so potentially if you could get it in its iron bound form it could increase iron but more studies are required. For those susceptible to iron overload, it could be worth looking into.

Surprisingly this key question seems to have the least amount of research on it. Putting global iron deficiency down to things like plant based diets, pregnancy, menstruation and childrens growth seems simplistic. We’ve been doing those things a long time, have we always been iron deficient? Here are a couple of my thoughts.

The first line of this story was true at the start of my research but I‘m not low in iron anymore. That doesn’t mean I have all the answers, just that I’ve found what works for me. If I had to sum up my thoughts i’d say:

Related posts:

Punya kamar tidur yang mencerminkan kepribadianmu adalah impian setiap orang. Dengan beberapa ide kreatif, kamu bisa mengubah kamar tidurmu menjadi ruang yang benar-benar mewakili dirimu. Artikel ini…

When trying to shape your life in a certain way or direction, it is essential to take a step back and analyse the certain influences in your life which may be limiting your progress without your…

Gulden in cijfers is samengesteld door Aat de Kwaasteniet op persoonlijke titel. De genoemde koersen zijn de gewogen gemiddelde openingskoersen van de verschillende exchanges. De laagste prijs werd…